March 30, 2009
A new proposal seeks to ban Chicago public school coaches from slapping, shaking, twisting, choking, hitting, pushing, pinching, head-banging or paddling athletes, as well as “avoid displays of temper.”
via Keeping coaches in check :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Education.
I know, I know – I haven’t blogged much of late. I have, however, been keeping an eye on the CPS coaches’ paddling scandal.
The above-described proposal begs the question: Why does this even need to be a proposal? Is there somebody who’s going to legitimately suggest that any of the described behavior would EVER be OK?
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized | Tagged: Chicago, coaching, corporal punishment, CPS |
Permalink
Posted by BBallCoach
January 9, 2008
Positive Coaching :: Joe Torre on Motivation
At his press conference to explain why he rejected a one-year, $5 million contract to continue as manager of the Yankees, Joe Torre provided a graduate-level seminar on motivation for coaches at every level.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized | Tagged: baseball, coaching, Joe Torre, motivation, Positive Coaching Alliance |
Permalink
Posted by BBallCoach
April 24, 2007
Take the Little League Baseball Ethics Challenge!
I blogged this same incident a while ago, but I’m finally learning that some of the news story links I post eventually disappear. I found an interesting retelling of it on a site that discusses sports ethics. I’m posting the entire description below in case this link goes kaput as well!
It’s an interesting look at two coaches’ attempts to use league-specific rules in a way that was never intended. Click the link above for the whole ethical analysis.
The Situation: On August 11 in Bristol, Conn., a Little League team from Colchester, Vt., only had to retire its Portsmouth, N.H. opposition in the top of the sixth inning (Little League games are six innings rather than nine) to win the game 9-8 and move on to the New England regional championship game.
But there was a problem. The Vermont team had made its third out in its half of the fifth inning before player Adam Bentley got to the plate. The Little League has a strict rule that requires every player to bat at least once a game, and the penalty for violating it is forfeit. Vermont’s coach Denis Place realized, to his horror, that even though his team had the lead entering the last inning the only way it could avoid losing by forfeit was for Bentley to get an at bat. For that to happen, the New Hampshire team would have to tie the score or take the lead, requiring the teams to play the last half of the sixth inning.
Place held a meeting of his players at the pitcher’s mound and instructed them to let New Hampshire score a run. The plan: walk the first batter, and ensure that he made it home with the assistance of wild pitches and intentional errors so the game would be deadlocked at 9-9. Then, hopefully, win the game in the bottom of the sixth inning, with Adam Bentley getting his mandated turn at the plate.
Not so fast. The New Hampshire team’s coach, Mark McCauley figured out what was happening and ordered his players not to score. So after a walk and two wild pitches allowed a New Hampshire runner to reach third base, the player refused to advance to the plate despite another wild pitch and a fielding error. McCauley also told his players to strike out intentionally, preserving Vermont’s lead but guaranteeing a successful New Hampshire protest that, under the rules, would require that New Hampshire win by forfeit.
This obviously led to a ridiculous spectacle: one team trying to give up a run while the other team was trying to make outs and avoid scoring. The perplexed umpires understandably chose to end the debacle by ejecting Place and his pitcher from the game. Vermont won 9-8…and then New Hampshire was awarded the victory by forfeit, because Adam Bentley never got his turn at bat. The New Hampshire team advanced to the next round.
Leave a Comment » |
youth sports | Tagged: baseball, coaching, Little League |
Permalink
Posted by BBallCoach
February 26, 2007
Looking for an Edge? Private Coaching, by the Hour – New York Times
Chelsea and Brockton Boretti, ages 11 and 9, of Wellington, Fla., work out one to three times a week with Sean Benevides, a coach and co-owner of Athlete’s Advantage, a 12,000-square-foot workout center in Wellington (athletesadvantageusa.com). There, the children enhance their athletic abilities by throwing medicine balls, running obstacle courses and leaping into sand pits.
Their parents, Robin and Mark Boretti, pay about $75 an hour for the pair to train with Mr. Benevides. Mrs. Boretti said she had seen a remarkable improvement in the children’s fitness and sports team performance over the last year. Chelsea is a softball pitcher and Brockton plays football and baseball.
I’d be interested to hear any else’s thoughts on private coaching for very young athletes. I’d be even more interested in reading any relevant research on its results in the following regards:
- Creating more “elite” level athletes in the long term
- Boosting young athletes’ self-esteem and efficacy
- Affecting the athlete’s actual ability
I can see both sides here. I have worked with high school athletes who have seen some very positive results from individual performance training, but I wonder about its role for the younger athletes (like the 9 and 11 year-olds mentioned above.)
1 Comment |
youth sports | Tagged: coaching, private coaching |
Permalink
Posted by BBallCoach